E-ISSN 2305-1620 | ISSN 2221-0288
 

Editorial & Peer Review Process



1. Submission of Paper

The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to the journal. This is usually via an online system. Occasionally, the journal may accept submissions by email.

2. Editorial Office Assessment

The staff at Editorial Office checks the paper’s composition and arrangement against the journal’s Author Guidelines to make sure that it includes the required sections and stylizations. The quality of the paper is not assessed at this point, but similarity check is performed to detect any possible plagiarism or redundant submission.

3. Appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief

The editor(s) checks that the paper is appropriate for the journal and is sufficiently original and interesting. If not, the paper may be rejected without being reviewed any further.

4. EIC Assigns an Associate Editor (AE) or Section Editor (where available)

The journal has Associate Editors and section editors who handle the peer review. They are assigned at this stage.

5. Invitation to Reviewers

The handling editor sends invitations to individuals he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers. As responses are received, further invitations are issued, if necessary, until the required number of acceptances is obtained – commonly this is 2, but may vary depending upon the submission type.

6. Response to Invitations

Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. They then accept or decline. If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers.

7. Review is Conducted

The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Otherwise they will read the paper several more times, taking notes so as to build a detailed point-by-point review. The review is then submitted to the journal, with a recommendation to accept or reject it – or else with a request for revision (usually flagged as either major or minor) before it is reconsidered.

8. Journal Evaluates the Reviews

The handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to get an extra opinion before making a decision.

9. The Decision is Communicated

The editor (or Editorial Office) sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. These comments are anonymous as the journal follows a double-blind peer review policy.

10. Next Steps

If accepted, the paper is sent to production. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor includes constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. At this point, reviewers may also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. If the paper was sent back for revision, the reviewers should expect to receive a new version, unless they have opted out of further participation. However, where only minor changes were requested this follow-up review might be done by the handling editor.



Most Viewed Articles
  • Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as predictive factor of the pain free syndrome duration after radionuclide treatment of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer
    Nigora Rasulova, Dauranbek Arybzhanov, Vladimir Lyubshin, Abdulla Abdikhakimov, Shamsutdin Sagdullaev,Sherzod Nishonov, Gayrat Arifhodjaev,Yuliya Shakirova, Valery Krylov, Marat Khodjibekov
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 11-18
    » Abstract

  • Radiosynoviorthesis in pigmented villonodular synovitis using Re-188 labelled tin colloid: a case report
    Aakif U Khan, Hameedullah, Abdul Saeed Shah, Muhammad Rauf Khattak
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 42-47
    » Abstract

  • Whither Nuclear Medicine Training in Pakistan?
    Durr-e-Sabih
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 1-2
    » Abstract

  • Functional ectopic cystic parathyroid adenomas: case reports and literature review
    Nigora Rasulova, Qaisar Hussain Siraj, Amir Javaid, Anwar Al-Banna
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 63-68
    » Abstract

  • Multifocal osteomyelitis on bone scan performed for mandibular mass with uncertain malignancy
    Salah Oueriagli Nabih, Hassna El Guerrouj, Imad Ghfir, Nouzha Ben Raïs
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 72-74
    » Abstract

  • Unusual spinal metastases from an adenoid cystic carcinoma of the maxillary sinus seen on a bone scan: a case report
    O Ait Sahel, I Ghfir, H Guerrouj, Y Benameur, N Benraiss
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 48-52
    » Abstract

  • Assessment of renal parenchymal damage by DMSA after PCNL procedure in children using adult-sized equipment
    Mohammad Sohaib, Manoj U Shenoy, Michael J Kellett, Patrick G Duffy, Isky Gordon
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 19-24
    » Abstract

  • SPECT/CT imaging of primary mediastinal goitre: case report and literature review
    Imad Ghfir, Abdallah Achir, Hasnae Guerrouj, Salah Nabih Oueriagli, Omar Ait Sahel, N Benraïs Aouad
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 53-58
    » Abstract

  • Unsuspected chronic multifocal osteomyelitis diagnosed on a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scan
    Qaisar Hussain Siraj, Amir Javaid, Khattab Khaled, Anwar Al-Banna
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 75-78
    » Abstract

  • Estimation of time for release of patients after the administration of I-131 to thyrotoxicosis patients
    Muhammad Akhtar, Jawad Akhtar Hussain, Akbar Ali, Sheraz Akhtar
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 3-10
    » Abstract

  • Most Downloaded
  • Successful Ra-223 treatment with a long interval between the second and the third cycles: a case report
    Tatiana Kochetova, Valeriy Krylov
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2017; 7(1): 38-41
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.7.7

  • Estimation of time for release of patients after the administration of I-131 to thyrotoxicosis patients
    Muhammad Akhtar, Jawad Akhtar Hussain, Akbar Ali, Sheraz Akhtar
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 3-10
    » Abstract

  • Cutaneous flow pattern of primary lymphoedema
    Qaisar Hussain Siraj
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2017; 7(1): 42-43
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.7.8

  • Radiosynoviorthesis in pigmented villonodular synovitis using Re-188 labelled tin colloid: a case report
    Aakif U Khan, Hameedullah, Abdul Saeed Shah, Muhammad Rauf Khattak
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 42-47
    » Abstract

  • Clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of patients with differentiated carcinoma of thyroid with bone metastases: a retrospective study
    Sadaf Tufail Butt, Shazia Fatima, Noreen Marwat, Kahkashan Mir, Ayesha Ammar, Mohammad Faheem
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2017; 7(1): 34-37
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.7.6

  • Multifocal osteomyelitis on bone scan performed for mandibular mass with uncertain malignancy
    Salah Oueriagli Nabih, Hassna El Guerrouj, Imad Ghfir, Nouzha Ben Raïs
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 72-74
    » Abstract

  • SPECT/CT imaging of primary mediastinal goitre: case report and literature review
    Imad Ghfir, Abdallah Achir, Hasnae Guerrouj, Salah Nabih Oueriagli, Omar Ait Sahel, N Benraïs Aouad
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 53-58
    » Abstract

  • Pulmonary arteriovenous malformation diagnosed on a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scan
    Khattab Khaled, Amir Javaid, Qaisar Hussain Siraj
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 69-71
    » Abstract

  • Functional ectopic cystic parathyroid adenomas: case reports and literature review
    Nigora Rasulova, Qaisar Hussain Siraj, Amir Javaid, Anwar Al-Banna
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 63-68
    » Abstract

  • Unsuspected chronic multifocal osteomyelitis diagnosed on a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scan
    Qaisar Hussain Siraj, Amir Javaid, Khattab Khaled, Anwar Al-Banna
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2016; 6(1): 75-78
    » Abstract

  • Most Cited Articles