E-ISSN 2305-1620 | ISSN 2221-0288
 
Peer Review Policy

 

Articles submitted for possible publication are subjected to peer-review. We follow a double-blind, peer review process. Articles are first reviewed by editors. The editor may reject it out of hand either because it is not dealing with the subject matter for that journal or because it is manifestly of a low quality so that it cannot be considered at all. Articles that are found suitable for review are then sent to two experts in the field of the paper. Referees of a paper are unknown to each other. Referees are asked to classify the paper as publishable immediately, publishable with amendments and improvements, or not publishable. Referees’ evaluations usually include an explicit recommendation of what to do with the manuscript. Referees’ comments are then seen by the author.

Editors should be ready to justify any important deviation from the described process. Editors should not reverse decisions on publication unless serious problems are identified.

Editors should publish guidance to either authors and reviewers on everything that is expected of them. This guidance should be regularly updated and will refer or link this code.

Further details are available under the link Editorial and Peer Review Process

 



Most Viewed Articles
Most Accessed Articles

  • Determination of the optimum filter for 99mTc SPECT breast imaging using a wire mesh collimator
    Xianling Dong, M I Saripan, R Mahmud, S Mashohor, Aihui Wang
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2017; 7(1): 9-15
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.7.2

  • Behaviour of wedges for different field sizes and depths
    Sajjad Ahmed Memon, Naeem Ahmed Laghari, Fayaz Hussain Mangi
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2017; 7(1): 20-27
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.7.4

  • Pre-operative cardiac risk stratification for noncardiac surgery in cancer patients using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy
    Iqbal Munir, Amrah Javaid, Khalid Nawaz, Mohammed Hathaf Al-Rowaily, Muaadh Abdualrehman Al-Asbahi
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2017; 7(1): 28-33
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.7.5

  • Clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of patients with differentiated carcinoma of thyroid with bone metastases: a retrospective study
    Sadaf Tufail Butt, Shazia Fatima, Noreen Marwat, Kahkashan Mir, Ayesha Ammar, Mohammad Faheem
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2017; 7(1): 34-37
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.7.6

  • A brief review of targetted radionuclide therapies
    Mohammed Hathaf Al-Rowaily, Daniele Dondi, MarcoChinol, Iqbal Munir, Muaadh Abdualrehman Alasbahi
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2017; 7(1): 4-8
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.7.1

  • Most Downloaded
    Top Downloaded Articles

  • Behaviour of wedges for different field sizes and depths
    Sajjad Ahmed Memon, Naeem Ahmed Laghari, Fayaz Hussain Mangi
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2017; 7(1): 20-27
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.7.4

  • Determination of the optimum filter for 99mTc SPECT breast imaging using a wire mesh collimator
    Xianling Dong, M I Saripan, R Mahmud, S Mashohor, Aihui Wang
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2017; 7(1): 9-15
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.7.2

  • Characterization of SIEMENS Symbia T SPECT camera in Monte Carlo simulation environment
    Xianling Dong, Mahmud Iqbal Saripan, Rozi Mahmud, Syamsiah Mashohor, Aihui Wang,
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2018; 8(1): 18-26
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.175-1540569779

  • A historic review of the discovery of the medical uses of radioiodine
    Barbara Hertz, Pushan Bharadwaj, Bennett Greenspan
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2020; 10(1): 60-63
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.175-1582813482

  • A brief review of targetted radionuclide therapies
    Mohammed Hathaf Al-Rowaily, Daniele Dondi, MarcoChinol, Iqbal Munir, Muaadh Abdualrehman Alasbahi
    Pak J Nucl Med. 2017; 7(1): 4-8
    » Abstract » doi: 10.24911/PJNMed.7.1

  • Most Cited Articles
    Most Cited Articles